Listed for further hearing. Appellants' counsel unaware of penalty deposit status; respondent counsel requested time to verify. Parties granted liberty to file written synopsis. Adjourned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| FPA-FE-12/CHN/2016 | |
|---|---|
| M/s. Graphite India Ltd. | … Appellant |
| & | |
| FPA-FE-13/CHN/2016 | |
| Shri Ashwin Manani | … Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai |
… Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Dinesh Agrawal, Advocate For the Respondent : Mrs. Aagam Kaur, Legal Consultant Mr. Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 20.04.2018
FPA-FE-12/CHN/2016 & FPA-FE-13/CHN/2016
Appellant’s counsel has made his submissions. He is not aware as to whether Shri Gangadharan Manari, Proprietor of M/s. Padmaja Impex has deposited Rs. 23,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Three Lakhs Only) as penalty amount or not. Even the counsel for the respondent is unaware. Counsel for the respondent seeks time to verify the position.
List on 20th August, 2018.
Both the parties are also granted liberty to file the written synopsis.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 20th April, 2018 ‘AS’
FPA-FE-12/CHN/2016 & FPA-FE-13/CHN/2016
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Graphite India Ltd.
Shri Ashwin Manani
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
MANMOHAN SINGH
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
