The Tribunal allowed the appellant one extension to submit a chart of legal heirs and inspect the record, refusing further adjournments and clarifying that the respondent retains the right to take action.
Appellant granted some time to submit a chart and inspect the record; no further adjournments allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-77/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-93/LKW/2013 (Sub) MP-18/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-19/LKW/2014 (COD) In FPA-73/LKW/1996 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (2) MP-94/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-20/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-21/LKW/2014 (COD) In FPA-74/LKW/1996 |
||
| Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (3) MP-92/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In FPA-75/LKW/1996 |
||
| Vikas Singh Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (4) MP-79/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-95/LKW/2013 (Sub) MP-22/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-23/LKW/2014 (COD) In |
||
| FPA-76/LKW/1996 | ||
| Shankar P. Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (5) MP-80/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-96/LKW/2013 (Sub) |
||
MP-24/LKW/2014 (Abatement) |
||
| FPA-73 to 84/LKW/1996 & FPA-16 to 19/LKW/1997 |
Page 1 of 5 |
| MP-25/LKW/2014 (COD) In FPA-77/LKW/1996 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Shankar P. Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (6) MP-81/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In FPA-78/LKW/1996 |
||
| Vishal Singh Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (7) MP-82/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In FPA-79/LKW/1996 |
||
| Vikas Singh Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (8) MP-83/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In FPA-80/LKW/1996 |
||
| Vishal Singh Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (9) MP-84/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In FPA-81/LKW/1996 |
||
| Vishal Singh Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (10) MP-85/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In |
||
FPA-82/LKW/1996 |
||
| Vishal Singh Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| FPA-73 to 84/LKW/1996 & FPA-16 to 19/LKW/1997 |
Page 2 of 5 |
Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent (11)MP-86/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In FPA-83/LKW/1996 Durga P. Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent (12)MP-87/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In FPA-84/LKW/1996 Durga P. Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent (13)MP-136/LKW/2017 (Misc.) MP-88/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-97/LKW/2013 (Sub) MP-26/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-27/LKW/2014 (COD) In FPA-16/LKW/1997 Durga P. Jaiswal LH … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent (14)MP-89/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-28/LKW/2014 (Sub) MP-29/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-30/LKW/2014 (COD) In FPA-17/LKW/1997 Akash Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent (15)MP-90/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-98/LKW/2013 (Sub) FPA-73 to 84/LKW/1996 & FPA-16 to 19/LKW/1997 Page 3 of 5
| MP-31/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-32/LKW/2014 (COD) In FPA-18/LKW/1997 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Shanker Prasad Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (16) MP-91/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In FPA-19/LKW/1997 |
||
| Durga P. Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Anurag Singh, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Munish Kumar, Advocate with Shri D.S. Bisth, Joint Commissioner
CORAM SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER
05.09.2018
FPA-73 to 84/LKW/1996, FPA-16 to 19/LKW/1997
These are old appeals of 1996. On the last occasion i.e. 11th July,
2018 the bench had directed the counsel for appellant, since 17 appeals have been filed, whereas the impugned order against which the appeals have been filed have only 6 defendants, to submit a chart with the name of the original appellants, the present appellant, how they are related to the original appellant and all details as mentioned therein.
FPA-73 to 84/LKW/1996 & FPA-16 to 19/LKW/1997
Page 4 of 5
Counsel for the appellant seeks some more time as he was unable to complete it in the time given. He also sought to inspect the record of the Tribunal, which is allowed.
The counsel for the respondent strongly objects and submitted that it is very old case and is unnecessarily dragging. None of these so called legal heirs of the deceased original defendant have yet been allowed substitution, as that matter is also pending. Hence not further time should be given and the case be heard, he pleaded.
In the interest of justice, while giving some time to the appellant to do the needful, it is clearly mentioned that no further adjournment would be given. They will submit the application alongwith the chart in advance to the respondent. It is also made clear that the respondent is not barred from taking any action as per law pursuant to the order.
List on 27th November, 2018.
(Ananya Ray)
Member
New Delhi, 5th September,2018
‘s’
FPA-73 to 84/LKW/1996 & FPA-16 to 19/LKW/1997
Page 5 of 5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant extension of time to the appellant to submit a chart of legal heirs and heirs details.
Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal / Vikas Singh Jaiswal / Shankar P. Jaiswal / Durga P. Jaiswal / Akash Jaiswal / Shanker Prasad Jaiswal
The Competent Authority, Lucknow
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
