The Tribunal granted an adjournment petition for a short extension as the respondent counsel needed time to review documents recently received from the appellant. The matter was listed for 11th July, 2018.
Adjournment granted for 11th July, 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-79/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-95/LKW/2013 (Sub) MP-22/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-23/LKW/2014 (COD)
In FPA-76/LKW/1996
Shankar P. Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Anurag Singh, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Munish Kumar, Advocate CORAM MRS. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER ORDER 16.03.2018
FPA-76/LKW/1996
The learned Counsel for the respondent seeks a short adjournment
as he has to go through the list of documents submitted by the appellant, which has been received by him recently. The learned Counsel for the appellant has no objection.
List this matter on 11th July, 2018. The ROA will be taken up
first.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 16th March, 2018 ‘r’
FPA-76/LKW/1996
Page 1 of 1
Shankar P. Jaiswal
The Competent Authority, Lucknow
Ananya Ray
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
