One Member of the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New Delhi, granted an adjournment on the merits, listing the matter on 11th July 2018 for the Respondent's Representative of Authority (ROA) to be heard first.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-94/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-20/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-21/LKW/2014 (COD)
In
FPA-74/LKW/1996
Ghanshyam Das Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Anurag Singh, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Munish Kumar, Advocate
CORAM MRS. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 16.03.2018
FPA-74/LKW/1996
The learned Counsel for the respondent seeks a short adjournment as he has to go through the list of documents submitted by the appellant, which has been received by him recently. The learned Counsel for the appellant has no objection.
List this matter on 11th July, 2018. The ROA will be taken up
first.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 16th March, 2018 ‘r’
FPA-74/LKW/1996
Page 1 of 1
Ghanshyam Das Jaiswal
The Competent Authority, Lucknow
Ananya Ray
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
