FPA-72/MUM/2017 of Mr. Tushar Shantilal Gandhi v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Mr. Tushar Shantilal Gandhi V/s The…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
| FPA-44/MUM/2017 Jaya Anoopchand shah |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| FPA-45/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr Shailesh H. Negandhi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-47/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Atul Anoopchand shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-48/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Niruben Jayant shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-49/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Asha Ramesh Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-50/MUM/2017 | ||
| M/s Shree Enterprises (chemicals) Pvt. Ltd. |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-51/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Charu Ajay Shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-52/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Vijay Gulabrai Goradia | … | Appellant |
| FPA-53/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Neeta Vijay Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-54/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Hemendra Vijaychand Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-55/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Ajay Anoopchand Shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-56/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Usha Hemendra Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-57/MUM/2017 | ||
| M/s Muscan Fero Silicon Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-58/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Laxmidas Gargovinddas | ||
| Vjora karta Ofr L.h. Vora HUF | … | Appellant |
| FPA-59/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Vijay Vinaychand Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-60/MUM/2017 | ||
| M/s Pruthvi Capital Market Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-61/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Bhupinder Singh | … | Appellant |
| FPA-44, 45-73/MUM/2017, FPA-75-78/MUM/2017 FPA-21/MUM/2015 & FPA-12/MUM/2014 |
Page 1 of 3
| FPA-62/MUM/2017 Mr. Dhiren Vasantraj Sheth |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| FPA-63/MUM/2017 Mrs. Komajit Ahuja |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-64/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Satindrpal Singh Ahuja | … | Appellant |
| FPA-65/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Chetan Vora | … | Appellant |
| FPA-66/MUM/2017 Mrs. Sheela Jasvant Khimani |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-67/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Jaspal Kaur Ahuja | … | Appellant |
| FPA-68/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Mihir Tushar Gandhi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-69/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Kumud Keshavlal Shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-70/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Arvinderpal Singh Ahuja | … | Appellant |
| FPA-71/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Rupa Tushar Gandhi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-72/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Tushar Shantilal Gandhi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-73/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Prakash Champaklal Shah | … | Appellant |
| MP-134/MUM/2017 (COD) | ||
| MP-78/MUM/2015 (STAY) |
||
| FPA-21/MUM/2015 | ||
| M/S Oyster Shipmenagement | ||
| Pvt. Ltd. Ors. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-12/BOM/2014 | ||
| M/s Royal Developers & Ors | … | Appellant |
| FPA-75/MUM/2017 | ||
| Hiral Tushar Gandhi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-76/MUM/2017 | ||
| Shipla Keten Mehta | … | Appellant |
| FPA-77/MUM/2017 | ||
| Rupa Singh | … | Appellant |
| FPA-78/MUM/2017 | ||
| Atul Shah(Deceased) | … | Appellant |
| FPA-44, 45-73/MUM/2017, FPA-75-78/MUM/2017 FPA-21/MUM/2015 & FPA-12/MUM/2014 |
Page 2 of 3
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Sadre Alam, Proxy Counsel for Kiren Jain, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Stanly Joseph, I.O.
CORAM
SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 05.01.2018
FPA-44-45 & 47-73/MUM/2017, FPA-75-78/MUM/2017 FPA-21/MUM/2015 & FPA-12/MUM/2014
Shri Sadre Alam, Proxy Counsel appears on behalf of the
appellant. He states that the main counsel is not available and he requests for an adjournment which is not opposed by the counsel for the respondent.
List on 21st February, 2018.
(Anany Ray) Member
New Delhi,
5th January, 2018
‘K’
FPA-44, 45-73/MUM/2017, FPA-75-78/MUM/2017 FPA-21/MUM/2015 & FPA-12/MUM/2014
Page 3 of 3
Jaya Anoopchand Shah
Mr. Shailesh H. Negandhi
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
M/S Oyster Shipmenagement Pvt. Ltd. Ors.
M/s Royal Developers & Ors
M/s Muscan Fero Silicon Ltd.
Ananya Ray
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court