FPA-69/MUM/2017 of Mrs. Kumud Keshavlal Shah v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
ATFPFPA-69/MUM/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Mrs. Kumud Keshavlal Shah V/s The Competent…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
¶2
| FPA-44/MUM/2017 Jaya Anoopchand shah |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| FPA-45/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr Shailesh H. Negandhi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-47/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Atul Anoopchand shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-48/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Niruben Jayant shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-49/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Asha Ramesh Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-50/MUM/2017 | ||
| M/s Shree Enterprises (chemicals) Pvt. Ltd. |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-51/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Charu Ajay Shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-52/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Vijay Gulabrai Goradia | … | Appellant |
| FPA-53/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Neeta Vijay Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-54/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Hemendra Vijaychand Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-55/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Ajay Anoopchand Shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-56/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Usha Hemendra Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-57/MUM/2017 | ||
| M/s Muscan Fero Silicon Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-58/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Laxmidas Gargovinddas | ||
| Vjora karta Ofr L.h. Vora HUF | … | Appellant |
| FPA-59/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Vijay Vinaychand Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-60/MUM/2017 | ||
| M/s Pruthvi Capital Market Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-61/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Bhupinder Singh | … | Appellant |
| FPA-44, 45-73/MUM/2017, FPA-75-78/MUM/2017 FPA-21/MUM/2015 & FPA-12/MUM/2014 |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Jaya Anoopchand Shah
- appellant
Mr Shailesh H. Negandhi
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Coram
AI extract
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court