Noting that the reply was not filed by the respondent due to change of counsel, the bench granted a final opportunity to file within two weeks and listed the matter for hearing on 20 December, 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1842/HYD/2015 (U/s 35) MP-PMLA-1843/HYD/2015 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-1844/HYD/2015 (Exem.) &
FPA-PMLA-988/HYD/2015
P. T. Prasad … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Advocate Mr. Faraz Maqbool, Advocate Mr. Akshat Gupta, Advocate For the Respondent : Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER ORDER 03.11.2017 FPA-PMLA-988/HYD/2015
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. Learned counsel for the respondent states that the reply could not be filed as Mr. S. A. Saud, who was the earlier counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent is no more with the Department and the respondent has to engage the services of a new counsel for the matter in the upcoming hearings.
One final opportunity is granted to the learned counsel for the respondent to file the same within two weeks.
List on 20th December, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 03rd November, 2017
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-988/HYD/2015
Page 1 of 1
P. T. Prasad
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
21 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
