None. This is a listing order granting time for the respondent to file a reply in an enforcement proceeding under the PMLA.
This order records that the respondent has been granted time to file a reply regarding a fresh application in an appeal filed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. No substantive legal proposition is decided in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1799/HYD/2015 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-961/HYD/2015
M/s Walden Properties Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant
Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Yogesh Raavi, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S. A. Saud, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
12.10.2017
FPA-PMLA-961/HYD/2015
At request, list on 18th January, 2018. Mr. Saud submits that he would be filing the reply in the registry today pertaining to the fresh application.
Copy has been given to the learned counsel for the appellant.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 12th October, 2017
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-961/HYD/2015
Page 1 of 1
M/s Walden Properties Pvt. Ltd.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
24 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
