Order in an appeal involving submission of a certified copy and reference to a High Court decision.
Appeal listed. Counsel for appellant submitted order and referred to High Court judgment. Counsel for respondent sought time for instructions. Case listed for future date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1792/JL/2015 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-947/JL/2015
Manjit Singh Gurmit Singh & Anr.
… Appellants/ Applicants
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellants | : Shri Jaiveer Shergill, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER
06.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-947/JL/2015
The counsel for the appellant has handed over the certified copy of the order dated 5th July, 2017. The counsel for the appellant has referred the decision of the High Court in the case of Rajiv Chanana Vs. Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement which is reported in 2014 SCC Online Del 4889. The counsel for the respondent seeks time to take the instruction from his client.
List on 8th September, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 6th July, 2017
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-947/JL/2015
Page 1 of 1
Manjit Singh Gurmit Singh & Anr.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
