This order grants an adjournment to the appellant in money laundering proceedings on the substance of counsel unavailability, subject to the payment of a cost.
Adjournment granted; cost of Rs. 2,000 paid to respondent's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1748/MUM/2015 (Interim Relief)
&
FPA-PMLA-909/MUM/2015
Sonal Patel
… Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Saurav Sood, Advocate
For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 18.01.2017
FPA-PMLA-909/MUM/2015
The above said matter is listed for arguments. The counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the arguing counsel is travelling and therefore an adjournment is sought which is opposed by the Shri S.A. Saud, learned counsel for the respondent. Subject to the cost of Rs. 2,000/-, list this matter for arguments. Cost shall be paid to the learned counsel for the respondent on or before the next date of hearing.
List on 24th April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 18th January, 2017. ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-909/MUM/2015
Page 1 of 1
Sonal Patel
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
