The Appellate Tribunal ordered an adjournment in pending money laundering appeals, granting the respondent two weeks to file written submissions and scheduling a final hearing on 6 April 2017.
Respondent granted two weeks time to file written submissions; matter listed for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3165/DLI/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-1742/DLI/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-900/DLI/2015
Axis Bank … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
Director- Financial Intelligence Unit -India (FIU) New Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Sh. Harin P. Rawal, Sr. Advocate Sh. Anmol Chandan, Advocate Ms. Priyanka Das, Advocate For the respondent : Ms. Pooja Bhaskar, Advocate
CORAM
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
|---|---|
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER
09.03.2017
MP-PMLA-3165/DLI/2017 (Misc.), MP-PMLA-1742/DLI/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-900/DLI/2015
The matter is kept for remaining arguments on behalf of the Respondent. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent submits that the Learned ASG has to make the submissions in this matter. An adjournment is sought on behalf of the Respondent. In the interest of justice, list this matter on 6th April, 2017 as final opportunity.
FPA-PMLA-900/DLI/2015
Page 1 of 2
The Respondent is granted two weeks time to file the written
submissions.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member New Delhi, 9th March, 2017
‘R’
FPA-PMLA-900/DLI/2015
Page 2 of 2
Axis Bank
Director- Financial Intelligence Unit -India (FIU)
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
