A procedural order where counsel for the appellant requested an extension to verify and file a rejoinder with cost, directing parties to submit written submissions on the next date.
Extension of one week to file rejoinder and pay cost; direction to file written submissions on next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2358/JP/2016 (Addl. Doc.) MP-PMLA-2357/JP/2016 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-1688/JP/2015 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-1687/JP/2015 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-899/JP/2015
Manju Tanwar … Appellant/ Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Shruti Rathore, Advocate Proxy Counsel for Narendra Tanwar & Manju Tanwar |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 23.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-899/JP/2015
Counsel for the appellant states that she will verify with the regular counsel as to whether the rejoinder has been filed in the Registry or not after removing the objection and in case it is still not filed, the same may be filed within one week and cost will also be paid in view of the earlier order. Both the parties are also to file the written submission on or before the next date.
FPA-PMLA-899/JP/2015
Page 1 of 2
List on 16th August, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 23rd March, 2017
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-899/JP/2015
Page 2 of 2
Manju Tanwar
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
