An interim order by the Appellate Tribunal under the PMLA granted the appellant a final opportunity to file a rejoinder and listed the appeal for future hearing when no one appeared on behalf of the appellant.
Six weeks granted to file rejoinder; appeal listed for 04 August 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1698/BNG/2015 (Stay) MP-PMLA-1690/BNG/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-892/BNG/2015
OLI Jagadeesha … Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 23.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-892/BNG/2015
Reply in the said matter has been filed. No one appears on behalf of the appellant. In the interest of justice, List this appeal on 04th August, 2017.
In the meanwhile, one final opportunity is granted to the appellant to file the rejoinder within six weeks from today. Both the parties will also file the written synopsis on or before the next date.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 23rd March, 2017 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-892/BNG/2015
Page 1 of 1
OLI Jagadeesha
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
B.K. BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
