The Tribunal refused the application for an adjournment sought by the appellant proxy counsel, citing the non-filing of a rejoinder, and listed the appeal for final argument.
On an application for adjournment citing counsel's availability due to family illness, the Tribunal noted the rejoinder had not been filed and deemed the right to file closed. The matter was listed for final argument.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-882/DLI/2015
Gagandeep Singh … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Darshan Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER
23.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-882/DLI/2015
Rejoinder has not been filed by the appellant. Right to file the rejoinder is closed. A proxy counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant and submits that the main counsel Shri Hemant Shah’s mother is not well. He also seeks an adjournment.
List the appeal for final argument on 11th May, 2015.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal)
Member
New Delhi,
23rd February, 2017
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-882/DLI/2015
Page 1 of 1
Gagandeep Singh
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
