In an order where the appellant was unrepresented, the Tribunal noted that the respondent intended to file a revision challenging an earlier discharge order. Consequently, the matter was re-notified on 15th September 2017 for filing the revision application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP- PMLA-3466/DLI/2017 FPA-PMLA-881/DLI/2015
Paramdeep Singh … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 30.05.2017
FPA-PMLA-881/DLI/2015
No one appears on behalf of the appellant. Mr. N.K Matta, Advocate Learned counsel for the respondent informed that all the appellants have been discharged by the Special Court vide the order dated 15th May, 2017. The department intends to challenge the said order revision of filing. Since, no one appear on behalf of the appellant in the interest of justice re-notify on 15th September, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 30th May, 2017
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-881/DLI/2015
Page 1 of 1
Paramdeep Singh
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
