FPA-PMLA-849/PTN/2015 of Roshan Minz v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was adjourned as the appellant did not appear, and the main counsel for the respondent was reported as unwell.
The appeal was adjourned as the appellant did not appear, and the main counsel for the respondent was reported as unwell.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-849/PTN/2015
Roshan Minz … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 02.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-849/PTN/2015
No one appears on behalf of the appellant. The main counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate is also stated that to be unwell. In the interest of the justice re-notify the matter.
List on 26th April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
2nd February, 2017
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-849/PTN/2015
Page 1 of 1
Roshan Minz
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court