A procedural order where the respondent in a money laundering appeal failed to file a reply. The appellate tribunal granted a final opportunity to the respondent, allowing a rejoinder thereafter if filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-848/PTN/2015
Jaikant Bara … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Sh. Abhishek Pratap Singh and Sh. Gaurav Agrawal, Advocates |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Sh. Nitesh Rana, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER
17.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-848/PTN/2015
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. One final opportunity granted to file the reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List on 13th November, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 17th July, 2017 M
FPA-PMLA-848/PTN/2015
Page 1 of 1
Jaikant Bara
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
