Appeal heard in the Preventive of Money Laundering Act proceedings. A reply was not filed by the respondent. The tribunal granted a final opportunity to file a reply, allowing the appellant to subsequently file a rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-846/PTN/2015
M/s Ekka Construction … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Sh. Abhishek Pratap Singh and Sh. Gaurav Agrawal, Advocates For the respondent : Sh. Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
17.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-846/PTN/2015
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. One final opportunity granted to file the reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List on 13th November, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member New Delhi, 17th July, 2017 M FPA-PMLA-846/PTN/2015
Page 1 of 1
M/s Ekka Construction
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
