FPA-PMLA-826/DLI/2015 of Hdfc Bank Limited v/s The Director, Fiu
Case brief
What is this about?
HDFC Bank Limited V/s The Director, FIU
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-826/DLI/2015
HDFC Bank Limited … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Director, FIU … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Dayan Krishanan, Sr. Advocate Ms. Smarika Singh, Advocate
For the respondent : Shri Satish Aggarwal, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 19.01.2017
FPA-PMLA-826/DLI/2015
An Adjournment is sought on behalf of the respondent. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that if a short date is given his client have no objection. Under these circumstances let both the parties may file the written synopsis on or before the next date. No adjournment is likely to be granted on the next date.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
HDFC Bank Limited
- respondent
The Director, FIU
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · January
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-826/DLI/2015
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court