The bench adjourned the hearing of the appeal due to the unavailability of the appellant's counsel in the Supreme Court. The matter was listed for future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1451/DLI/2015 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA/789/DLI/2015
M/s Asera Banka Power Pvt. Ltd. Mum … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant : |
Shri Amit Krishna, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent : |
Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : |
CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA : |
MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL : |
MEMBER |
| ORDER 26.04.201 |
7 |
FPA-PMLA/789/DLI/2015
Mr. Vijay Agarwala learned counsel for the appellant is not available
as he is busy in the Supreme Court.
In the interest of Justice, list on 08th September, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 26th April, 2017
‘A’
FPA-PMLA/789/DLI/2015
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant bank is available to represent in the appeal against the enforcement action.
When the hearing should be listed given the counsel's unavailability.
M/s Asera Banka Power Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
