The Appellate Tribunal fixed the FPA-PMLA-706/2014 arising in the money-laundering matter for list date due to counsel absence, without deciding the substantive appeal.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4126/ LKW /2017 R.P. MP-PMLA-1319/ LKW /2014 Stay FPA-PMLA-706/ LKW /2014
Narendra Pratap Singh … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None. For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 18.12.2017
FPA-PMLA-706/ LKW /2014
Registry has received the communication that the appellant’s
counsel could not come due to late of train.
List on 14th May, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 18th December, 2017.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-706/LKW/2014
Page 1 of 1
Narendra Pratap Singh
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
