The appellate tribunal rejected an application seeking waiver or reduction of costs imposed on the appellant, citing repeated adjournments by the appellant.
Application for waiver of cost dismissed; cost to be paid within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1438/AHD/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-690/AHD/2014
Manju Dinesh Kumar Gupta … Appellant / Applicant Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Narendra L. Jain, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. S. A. Saud, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
20.09.2017
FPA-PMLA-690/AHD/2014
Fresh application has been filed for waiver of cost which was imposed on appellant on 11th July, 2017. After small hearing, learned counsel for the appellants submits that cost may be reduced. We are not inclined to accept the request as appellant has taken many adjournment in the matter. The application is, accordingly, dismissed. The cost shall be paid within six weeks.
Both the parties will file the written synopsis on or before the next
date.
Interim Order to continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 20th September, 2017
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-690/AHD/2014
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Application for waiver of cost dismissed due to multiple adjournments
Manju Dinesh Kumar Gupta
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
