The appellate tribunal listed the matter on 7 April 2017 for the appellant to review the respondent's affidavit. Any adjournment sought by the appellant's counsel was not opposed. The judgment contains no disposal or substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-686/DLI/2014
Raina Suri … Appellant Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Ms. Bhawna Gupta, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 04.01.2017
FPA-PMLA-686/DLI/2014
The respondent has filed the affidavit in compliance order dated 3rd November, 2016. The learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to go through the same. Even the counsel of the appellant is not ready today. An adjournment is sought by her which is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent.
List on 7th April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 4th January, 2017 ‘A’ FPA-PMLA-686/DLI/2014
Page 1 of 1
Raina Suri
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
