The Appellate Tribunal admitted the written synopsis and adjourned the proceeding to March 29, 2017 for remaining argument by the respondent.
Time granted to respondent to file written synopsis; case listed for remaining argument on May 29, 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1731/LKW/2015 (MICS) MP-PMLA-1505/LKW/2015 (FDR) MP-PMLA-1507/LKW/2015 (Affidavit) MP-PMLA-1253/LKW/2014 (Interim Relief) &
FPA-PMLA-685/LKW/2014
Radhey Shayam Dubey
… Appellant
Versus
Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri P. Chakravarty, Advocate. For the respondent : Sh. S.A. Saud, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 17.04.2017
FPA-PMLA-685/LKW/2014
The counsel for the appellant has made his submissions. He has also filed the written synopsis and a copy of the same is served to the counsel for the respondent who seeks one week time to file the written synopsis. Let the same be done within four weeks.
List for remaining argument of respondent on 29th May, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 17th April, 2017. ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-685/LKW/2014
Page 1 of 1
Radhey Shayam Dubey
Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
