Disposed

FPA-PMLA-665/DLI/2014 of Sh. G. Janardhan Reddy v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

ATFP5 May 2017FPA-PMLA-665/DLI/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-page order marked an appeal filed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act as disposed of due to a prior High Court order quashing attachment proceedings. Liberalty was granted to revive the appeal if that order is interfered with.

What did the court decide?

liberty granted to revive the appeal if the order of the Hon'ble High Court is interfered with.

FPA-PMLA-665/DLI/2014 of Sh. G. Janardhan Reddy v/s The Deputy… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-1672/DLI/2015 (Stay) MP-PMLA-1673/DLI/2015 (u/s 35) FPA-PMLA-665/DLI/2014

¶3

Sh. G. Janardhan Reddy

¶4

… Appellant/Applicant

¶5

Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent

¶6

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶7

For the Appellant	:	Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate
For the Respondent	:	Shri R. Rajesh, A. D., Bangalore
		Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate

¶8

CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI G.C. MISHRA	: MEMBER
SHRI B.K. BANSAL	: MEMBER

¶9

ORDER 05.05.2017

¶10

MP-PMLA-1672/DLI/2015 (Stay), MP-PMLA-1673/DLI/2015 (u/s 35) FPA-PMLA-665/DLI/2014

¶11

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in view of the order passed in W.P No. 11440-11441 of 2016 dated 13^th March, 2017 (corrected on 22^nd March, 2017) the appeal may be disposed of.

¶12

Mr. Vikas Garg, Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that the said order is under process of filing the Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court. Thus the matter be adjourned. Counsel for the appellant strongly opposes the adjournment.

¶13

In view of the order dated 13^th March, 2017 (corrected on 22^nd March, 2017) of the Karnataka High Court, under which the attachment orders

¶14

FPA-PMLA-665/DLI/2014

¶15

Page 1 of 2

¶16

passed against the Writ Petitioners have been quashed, the Appeal is disposed of. The liberty is granted to revive the appeal in case the order of the Hon’ble High Court is interferred with.

¶17

Order be given “ dasti” to both sides.

¶18

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶19

(G.C. Mishra) Member

¶20

(B.K. Bansal) Member

New Delhi,

05^th May, 2017

‘AS’

FPA-PMLA-665/DLI/2014

¶25

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-665/DLI/2014 of Sh. G. Janardhan Reddy v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-665/DLI/2014 of Sh. G. Janardhan Reddy v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases