The Appellate Tribunal granted an adjournment in multiple Prevention of Money Laundering Act appeals due to the appellant counsel's health issues and allowed parties liberty to file written synopses.
Adjournment granted; liberty granted to file written synopsis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP-PMLA-979/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-576/MUM/2014 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Meenaxi Mansotra | … | Appellant | |
| MP-PMLA-981/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-578/MUM/2014 |
|||
| SH. Aashwani Kumar Sharma | … | Appellant | |
| MP-PMLA-982/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-579/MUM/2014 |
|||
| Meenakshi Mansotra | … | Appellant | |
| FPA-PMLA-630/MUM/2014 | |||
| Meenakshi Mansotra | … | Appellant | |
| MP-PMLA-1019/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-583/MUM/2014 |
|||
| Meenakshi Mansotra | … | Appellant | |
| MP-PMLA-1171/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-631/MUM/2014 |
|||
| Ms. Mannat Mansotra | … | Appellant | |
| MP-PMLA-1172/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-632/MUM/2014 |
|||
| Meenakshi Mansotra | … | Appellant | |
| MP-PMLA-1176/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-633/MUM/2014 |
|||
| Ms. Mannat Mansotra | … | Appellant | |
| MP-PMLA-1178/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-634/MUM/2014 |
|||
| Meenakshi Mansotra | … | Appellant | |
| MP-PMLA-1180/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-635/MUM/2014 |
|||
| Ashwani Kumar Sharma | … | Appellant | |
| Versus | |||
| The Deputy Director | |||
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… |
Respondent | |
| Adv | ocates/Authorized Representatives | who appe | ared |
| For t | he appellant : | Mr. Ashwa Appellant |
ni Kumar Sharma, |
| For t | he respondent : |
Shri Vikas | Garg, Advocate |
| COR | AM | ||
| JUS MRS |
TICE MANMOHAN SINGH . ANANYA RAY |
: CHA : ME |
IRMAN MBER |
FPA-PMLA-576, 578, 579, 583 & 630-635/MUM/2014
Page 1 of 2
ORDER 25.10.2017
FPA-PMLA-576, 578, 579 & 583/MUM/2014, FPA-PMLA-630635/MUM/2014
In the above said matter earlier Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate was appearing on behalf of the appellant. Mr. Ashwani Kumar Sharma, Appellant in FPA-PMLA-MUM-578/2014 submits that he has to engage a new counsel in the matter. It could not be done as he suffered from paralyses attack. An adjournment is sought on behalf of Mr. Saud, counsel for the respondent. Liberty is also granted to both the parties to file written synopsis.
List on 21st March, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 25th October, 2017.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-576, 578, 579, 583 & 630-635/MUM/2014
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant an adjournment due to the illness of appellant counsel.
Whether to grant liberty to file written synopsis.
Meenaxi Mansotra and others
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Justice Manmohan Singh
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
