Listing order in an appeal filed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The appeal was adjourned due to the respondent's counsel being out of station. No substantive decision was reached.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-625/CHN/2014 S. Jagadeesha … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri M. Anabalagan, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Shir Nitesh Rana, Advocate on behalf of Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER
01.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-625/CHN/2014
Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent is out of station. An adjournment is sought on behalf by Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate which is not opposed by the learned counsel for the appellant. List on 10th April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 01st March, 2017 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-625/CHN/2014 Page 1 of 1
Jagadeesha
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
