The Tribunal accepted a representation from the appellant's counsel stating unavailability due to pilgrimage, with the respondent's counsel having no objection. The matter was listed for a future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-252/AHD/2010 (SP)
&
FPA-PMLA-62/AHD/2010 Ramkaran Chotalal Yadav … Appellant/ Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate on behalf of Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 06.01.2017
FPA-PMLA-62/AHD/2010
One representation is circulated on behalf of the appellant’s counsel Shri Nimish Kapadia submitting that he is out of station for pilgrimage and is unable to attend the Tribunal today. Even Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate appearing on behalf of Shri Rajeev Awasthi, learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the same.
List this matter on 21st March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 6th January, 2017
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-62/AHD/2010
Page 1 of 1
Ramkaran Chotalal Yadav
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
20 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
