The Preventive Money Laundering Appeals Tribunal granted a final opportunity to parties to file written synopses and listed the matter for further hearing.
This order does not decide any substantial legal issue. The tribunal merely noted the absence of written synopsis and extended a six-week time limit for filing the same before listing the matter for hearing. No relief or decision was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-619/LKW/2014
Shafaat Ejaz Siddiqui & Ors. … Appellants / Applicants
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellants | : | S. Kumar, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : | MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : | MEMBER |
ORDER
18.04.2017
FPA-PMLA-619/LKW/2014
Written synopsis have not been filed by the parties. One final
opportunity is granted to file the same within six weeks.
List on 6th September, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 18th April, 2017 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-619/LKW/2014
Page 1 of 1
Shafaat Ejaz Siddiqui & Ors.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
