Provided liberty to defaulting counsel to file written submissions on pending appeal; listed remaining cases for arguments. No substantive decision rendered.
Order granting liberty to absent counsel for the respondent to file written submissions in a pending appeal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and listing related cases for further arguments on a future date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-596/LKW/2014
Punjab National Bank … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Rajat Sharma, Advocate Mr. M. Nadeem, Advocate For the Respondent : Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER
03.11.2017
FPA-PMLA-596/LKW/2014
Written submissions have been filed by Punjab National Bank. The counsel for the mortgagers submits that the mortgager has no objection if the relief to the Bank is granted. Counsel for the appellant has also made his submissions. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, Mr. Vikas Garg is not available. With a view to settle the matter with the Bank, list remaining cases also for arguments on 17th November, 2017. Liberty is also granted to Mr. Vikas Garg, learned counsel for the respondent to file the written submissions.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Ananya Ray) Member New Delhi, 03rd November, 2017 ‘AS’ FPA-PMLA-596/LKW/2014
Page 1 of 1
Punjab National Bank
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
