The Appellate Tribunal under the PMLA granted an adjournment in FPA-PMLA-593/LKW/2014 due to unavailability of the appellant's arguing counsel. Both parties were instructed to file written synopses.
Adjournment to 11th October, 2017; parties directed to file written synopses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3598/LKW/2017 (Adj.) MP-PMLA-3230/LKW/2017 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-593/LKW/2014
Santoshi Devi … Appellant/Applicant
Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Imran Alam, Advocate Shri Abhay Pandey, Advocate For the respondent : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 14.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-593/LKW/2014
An adjournment is sought on behalf of the appellant as the main arguing counsel is not available due to personal difficulty, which is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent.
List on 11th October, 2017.
Both the parties are to file the written synopsis on or before the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 14th July, 2017. ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-593/LKW/2014
Page 1 of 1
Santoshi Devi
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
MANMOHAN SINGH
ANAND KISHORE
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
