Interim order fixing the matter for final hearing after noting counsels' intimation of written submissions in an appeal against forfeiture proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-571/MUM/2014
Deepak Sharad Jare … Appellant/Applicant Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Harish Raichura, Advocate Ms. Saroj Harish Raichura, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
11.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-571/MUM/2014
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that he would be filing the written submissions.
Let both the parties file the written submissions. List this matter
for final hearing.
List on 6th November, 2017 at 02:30 PM.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 11th July, 2017
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-571/MUM/2014
Page 1 of 1
Deepak Sharad Jare
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
