An interim stay order in Money Laundering Act proceedings where the tribunal listed parties for remaining arguments and granted time to file written synopses. No substantive disposal.
Time granted for filing written synopses; listing for arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-828/LKW/2014 (Stay) MP-PMLA-836/LKW/2014 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-548/LKW/2013
M/s. Balaji Universal Tradelink (P) Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Amitabh Gupta, Advocate For the Union Bank of India : Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Advocate Mr. Md. Ziauddin Ahmad, Advocate Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate Mr. A. R. Aditya, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 09.10.2017
FPA-PMLA-548/LKW/2013
Part submissions have been made on behalf of the parties. The counsels for the Union Bank of India as well as the respondent are granted four weeks time to file the written synopsis.
List for remaining arguments on 20th November, 2017 at 02:30 PM.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 09th October, 2017
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-548/LKW/2013
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Balaji Universal Tradelink (P) Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
The Union Bank of India
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
18 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
