A one-line order from the Appellate Tribunal setting the next hearing date for a stay application in a money laundering matter. No arguments were presented, and both parties were allowed to file a written synopsis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-864/CHN/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-518/CHN/2013
M. Moorthy … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate on behalf of Shri Rajeev Awasthi
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 24.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-518/CHN/2013
No one appears on behalf of the appellant. Even Rajeev Awasthi
Counsel for the respondent is not available.
List on 14th December, 2017.
Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis on or
before the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 24th July, 2017 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-518/CHN/2013
Page 1 of 1
M. Moorthy
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Justice Manmohan Singh
Shri Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
