Appellant sought time to file written synopsis in money laundering proceedings; Tribunal granted four weeks and listed matter for next hearing without deciding merits.
Respondent granted four weeks to file written synopsis. This is a listing order without substantive disposition on merits of PMLA appeal; no legal proposition established. (Quality: thin)
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-515/MUM/2013
Rashmi Sanjeev Banagad … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Rakesh Kumar, Advocate MS. Anushka Singh, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
29.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-515/MUM/2013
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to file the written
synopsis. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List on 4th July, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 29th March, 2017. ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-515/MUM/2013
Page 1 of 1
Rashmi Sanjeev Banagad
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
