FPA-PMLA-501/AHD/2013 of Smt. Tinoo Joshi v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad

ATFP12 Jan 2017FPA-PMLA-501/AHD/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Appellate Tribunal fixed costs for the restoration of an earlier dismissed appeal. With the appellant agreeing to deposit Rs. 15,000 against a respondent's claim of Rs. 25,000, the matter was listed for final hearing.

What did the court decide?

Matter listed for final hearing on 18 April 2017; appellant to deposit Rs. 15,000 cost.

FPA-PMLA-501/AHD/2013 of Smt. Tinoo Joshi v/s The Deputy Director… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-2304/AHD/2016 (Rest.)

¶3

in FPA-PMLA-501/AHD/2013

¶4

Smt. Tinoo Joshi … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad … Respondent

¶5

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶6

For the appellant : Shri Varun K. Chopra, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER

¶7

ORDER 12.01.2017

¶8

MP-PMLA-2304/AHD/2016 (Rest.) in FPA-PMLA-501/AHD/2013

¶9

The above mentioned application has been filed by the appellant for restoration of MP-PMLA-1971/AHD/2014 and FPA-PMLA-501/AHD/2013 which was dismissed by order dated 21.10.2015.

¶10

Reply to the above mentioned application for restoration has been filed by the respondent stating that appellant has deliberately got the earlier appeal dismissed in order to achieve the benefit from other proceedings in which the appellant was ultimately not successful. Therefore, now he is pressing the prayer in this application. However, he has no objection to the restoration of appeal subject to imposition of heavy cost to be deposited with the respondent so that the appeal can be heard

¶11

MP-PMLA-2304/AHD/2016 (Rest.) in FPA-PMLA-501/AHD/2013

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

and decided on merits. The learned counsel for the appellant is agreeable to deposit the sum of Rs. 10,000/- in each matter. The learned counsel for the respondent is pressing for cost of Rs. 25,000/- in each case. Let the appellant deposit Rs. 15,000/- to allow the prayer in the present application.

¶14

List for final hearing on 18^th April, 2017.

¶15

The learned counsel for the appellant agrees that the appellant will

¶16

not take the unnecessary adjournment in the matter.

¶17

Cost shall be deposited with the respondent within four weeks from today. Both the parties will file the written synopsis on or before the next date of hearing.

¶18

Order be provided ‘dasti’ to both sides.

¶19

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶20

(Kaushal Srivastava) Member

¶21

(Anand Kishore) Member

¶22

New Delhi, 12^th January, 2017.

¶23

‘d’

¶24

MP-PMLA-2304/AHD/2016 (Rest.) in FPA-PMLA-501/AHD/2013

¶25

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-501/AHD/2013 of Smt. Tinoo Joshi v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-501/AHD/2013 of Smt. Tinoo Joshi v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases