This order from the Pre-Money Laundering Act Appeals Tribunal lists a case for hearing on 16.05.2017, noting that the respondent's counsel is unavailable and allowing parties to submit written synopses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1752/BNG/2015 (Rest.) &
FPA-PMLA-477/BNG/2013 Jagdish Chandra Prakash … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant : | Shri Rajeev Awasti, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent : |
Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : SHRI G.C. MISHRA : |
CHAIRMAN MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL : |
MEMBER |
| ORDER 23.03.201 |
7 |
FPA-PMLA-477/BNG/2013
Counsel for the appellant has made the submission for some time.
The main counsel on behalf of respondent is not available. Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis.
List on 16th May, 2017
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 23rd March, 2017
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-477/BNG/2013 Page 1 of 1
Jagdish Chandra Prakash
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
