The Fixed Appeals Court, while listing the appeal for hearing, noted the appellant's submission regarding the non-maintainability of the complaint under section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-473/BNG/2013
S. Harish … Appellant Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant | : Shri Kirit S. Javali, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent |
: Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 20.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-473/BNG/2013
The learned counsel for all the appellants submitted that the appeal be heard on the question of non-maintainability of the criminal complaint filed by the respondent under section 45 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 is not maintainable. They wish to file the compilation of documents in that aspect.
List these appeals on 14th November, 2017 at 02:30 PM. Liberty is also granted to the ld. Counsel for the respondent, Mr. Vikas Garg to file the written submission on or before the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 20th July, 2017 ‘AS’ FPA-PMLA-473/BNG/2013 Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal complaint filed under section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 is maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Harish
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
