Part submissions were concluded by the appellant. The respondent's counsel stated lack of brief from authorities, leading the tribunal to adjourn the matter for further arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-472/BNG/2013
C. Subramannappa … Appellant Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Kirit S. Javali, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 16.05.2017
FPA-PMLA-472/BNG/2013
Part submissions have been made on behalf of the appellant. Learned Counsel for the respondent Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate states that he has not been briefed by the Departmental Authorities of Bangalore Zone for today’s hearing therefore matter be adjourned for some date. All the parties who have not filed the written synopsis so far are agreeable to file the same on or before the next date.
List for remaining arguments on 20th July, 2017 at 11:00 AM.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 16th May, 2017 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-472/BNG/2013 Page 1 of 1
C. Subramannappa
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
