The Appellate Tribunal accepted liberty to file a written synopsis within two weeks; the order did not dispose of the merits of the appeal filed under Section 35 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act.
Liberty granted to file written synopsis within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1747/DLI/2015 (U/s 35) In FPA-PMLA-462/DLI/2013
APL Research Centre Ltd.
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Appellant
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Rajshekhar Rao, Advocate Mr. K. Harshavardhan, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 14.09.2017
FPA-PMLA-462/DLI/2013
Order reserved.
Liberty is granted to file the written synopsis within two weeks.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member New Delhi, 14th September, 2017. ‘s’
In FPA-PMLA-462/DLI/2013
Page 1 of 1
APL Research Centre Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
