The appeal could not be disposed of on the hearing date as the main counsel for the respondent was unavailable. The Tribunal directed both parties to file written synopses and listed the matter for a subsequent date. No substantive decision is recorded in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1110/BNG/2014 (U/S 35)
& FPA-PMLA-458/BNG/2013 K. Rangaswamy … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Rajeev Awasti, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 23.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-458/BNG/2013
Counsel for the appellant has made the submission for some time. The main counsel on behalf of respondent is not available. Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis.
List on 16th May, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 23rd March, 2017
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-458/BNG/2013
Page 1 of 1
K. Rangaswamy
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
