The Appeals Tribunal in a PMLA matter permitted the withdrawal of counsel by one advocate and accepted the appearance of another filed on behalf of the appellant.
Allowed withdrawal of counsel by Shri Rajeev Awasthi and accepted appearance of Shri Kiran Javali.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-453/BNG/2013
Smt. M. Soumya … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate Shri Kirit Javali, Advocate Shri. Kiran Javali, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 20.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-453/BNG/2013
Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, learned counsel for the appellant wishes to withdraw his Vakalatnama in the above said matters. He submits that his client would make the necessary arrangements. Mr. Kiran Javali, Advocate has now appeared in the above said appeals on behalf of the appellants. He has no objection if the Vakalatnama of Mr. Rajeev Awasthi be treated as withdrawn.
Order Accordingly.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
20th July, 2017
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-453/BNG/2013 Page 1 of 1
Smt. M. Soumya
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
