Single line order granting adjournment to respondent. Written submissions required. Further adjournment refused.
Adjournment granted for written submissions; listing fixed for 23rd October 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3145/BNG/2017 (Misc) FPA-PMLA-444/BNG/2013 M.Gopi … Appellant MP-PMLA-3146/BNG/2017 (Misc) MP-PMLA-1595/BNG/2015 (u/s 35) FPA-PMLA-446/BNG/2013 S.V. Srinivas … Appellant FPA-PMLA-447/BNG/2013 Smt. Reshma Srinivas … Appellant MP-PMLA-1594/BNG/2015 (u/s 35) MP-PMLA-664/BNG/2013 (u/s 35) FPA-PMLA-448/BNG/2013 Smt. Saraswati … Appellant FPA-PMLA-449/BNG/2013 S.K.V. Chalapahty … Appellant FPA-PMLA-456/BNG/2013 Saraswati … Appellant MP-PMLA-3065/BNG/2017 (Misc) FPA-PMLA-445/BNG/2013 Smt. Sowbhagya … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. R. Swaroop Anand, Advocate For the respondent : Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER
25.09.2017
FPA-PMLA-444 to 449 & 456/BNG/2013
Learned counsel for the appellant has concluded his submissions.
Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate argued in part. An adjournment is sought on
behalf of the respondent.
FPA-PMLA-444 to 449 & 456/BNG/2013
Page 1 of 2
Written submissions, if any, be filed by the respondent. No further
adjournment will be granted.
List on 23rd October, 2017 at 02:30 PM.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi,
25th September, 2017
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-444 to 449 & 456/BNG/2013
Page 2 of 2
M. Gopi
S.V. Srinivas
Reshma Srinivas
Saraswati
S.K.V. Chalapahty
Sowbhagya
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
