Adjournment of a file in an PMLA appeal was granted due to personal difficulty of the respondent's counsel, with the matter listed for August 1, 2017.
Matter listed for August 1, 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-432/CHN/2013 N. Usha … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri R.K Handoo, Advocate For the respondent : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
10.04.2017
FPA-PMLA-432/CHN/2013
Adjournment is sought on behalf of Mr. N.K. Matta, Advocate on
the ground that he is in personal difficulty. The request for adjournment is not opposed by the counsel for the respondent.
List on 1st August, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 10th April, 2017.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-432/CHN/2013
Page 1 of 1
N. Usha
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
