The Appellate Tribunal, PMLA, adjourned proceedings after noting that the High Court had stayed the proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, upon submissions from the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-203/KOL/2011
Pranawa Kedia … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Sabyasachi Banerjee, Advocate Shri Ayan Bhattacherjee, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 27.04.2017
FPA-PMLA-203/KOL/2011
Both the parties have made their submissions for some time. The counsel for the appellant has pointed out that the proceedings of the complaint under Prevention of Money Laundering Act have been stayed by the Hon’ble High Court. The counsel for the respondent does not deny the said fact.
List on 31st August, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
27th April, 2017.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-203/KOL/2011
Page 1 of 1
Pranawa Kedia
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
