Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1989/CHN/2017 of M/s. Oakdale Properties Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

ATFP6 Nov 2017FPA-PMLA-1989/CHN/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Appellate Tribunal under the PMLA recorded an interlocutory order in an appeal and application. The appeal was filed under Section 26 PMLA. Directions were issued regarding notice filing for reply and rejoinder. The court noted the appellant had not received the Section 8(4) notice and allowed them to press for interim order subsequently.

What did the court decide?

Fixed dates for reply and rejoinder; no interim order granted yet pending receipt of Section 8(4) notice.

FPA-PMLA-1989/CHN/2017 of M/s. Oakdale Properties Pvt. Ltd. v/s… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3811/CHN/2017 (STAY)

¶3

FPA-PMLA-1989/CHN/2017

¶4

M/s. Oakdale Properties Pvt. Ltd.

¶5

… Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

¶8

… Respondent

¶9

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶10

For the appellant	: Shri Abhishek Kumar Pandey, Advocate Shri R. Narayanan Chandrasekar, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SMT. ANANYA RAY	: CHAIRMAN : MEMBER

¶11

ORDER 06.11.2017

¶12

FPA-PMLA-1989/CHN/2017 & MP-PMLA-3811/CHN/2017 (Stay)

¶13

The appeal has been filed under section 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 29^th August 2017. Issue notice. Mr. Tripathi, learned Counsel for the respondent accepts the notice. Let the reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant. Rejoinder be filed four weeks thereafter.

¶14

As far as interim order is concerned the appellant has not received the notice under section 8(4) by the respondent. As and when the notice is received by the appellant he may press for an interim order, which will be decided on merits at that time.

¶15

List appeal and application on 16^th April 2018.

¶16

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶17

(Ananya Ray) Member

¶18

New Delhi,

¶19

06^th November, 2017

¶20

‘r’

¶21

FPA-PMLA-1989/CHN/2017 Page 1 of 1

FPA-PMLA-1989/CHN/2017 of M/s. Oakdale Properties Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1989/CHN/2017 of M/s. Oakdale Properties Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases