Appeal and stay application admitted against Enforcement Directorate order. Notice issued to respondent for reply within six weeks. Applicant pressed for interim order pending section 8(4) notice.
Notice issued to respondent for reply within six weeks; no interim order granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3808/BNG/2017(EXM.) MP-PMLA-3807/BNG/2017 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1927/BNG/2017
Smt. Sulochanamma D.
… Appellants/Applicants
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
… Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Sneha R. Iyer, Advocate Shri Nishanth Patil, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 06.10.2017
FPA-PMLA-1927/BNG/2017
A fresh appeal has been filed u/s 26 of the PMLA-2002 against the order dated 7th July, 2017.
Issue notice. Mr. N.K. Matta, counsel for the respondent accepts the notice and seeks six weeks time to file the reply. Let the same be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant, who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 22nd March, 2018.
MP-PMLA-3807/BNG/2017 (Stay)
Alongwith the appeal an application for stay has been filed. Issue notice to the respondent. Mr. N.K. Matta, counsel of the respondent accepts the notice and seeks six weeks time to file the reply. Let the same
FPA-PMLA-1927/BNG/2017
Page 1 of 2
be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant, who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 22nd March, 2018.
The learned counsel for the appellant is pressing for interim order however, he submits that no notice u/s 8(4) has been received. Mr. N.K. Matta, counsel for the respondent agrees in case notice u/s 8(4) of PMLA has been issued, a copy of the same will also serve to the appellant, who may press the interim order.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 06th October, 2017.
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1927/BNG/2017
Page 2 of 2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to admit an appeal filed under section 26 of the PMLA against an order dated 7th July, 2017.
Whether to grant a stay application pending the disposal of the appeal.
Whether the applicant is entitled to an interim order before receipt of notice under section 8(4).
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sulochanamma D.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
