Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1926/BNG/2017 of Prashanth Govindraju v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore

ATFP6 Oct 2017FPA-PMLA-1926/BNG/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court issued notices in an appeal and stay application filed under section 26 of the PMLA. It adjourned proceedings, granting the respondent six weeks to file a reply, and considered the applicant's submission regarding the issuance of a mandatory section 8(4) notice.

What did the court decide?

Notice issued; the respondent was granted six weeks to file a reply.

FPA-PMLA-1926/BNG/2017 of Prashanth Govindraju v/s The Deputy… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3806/BNG/2017(EXM.) MP-PMLA-3805/BNG/2017 (Stay) &

¶3

FPA-PMLA-1926/BNG/2017

¶4

Prashanth Govindraju … Appellants/Applicants

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Deputy Director

¶7

Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore

¶8

… Respondents

¶9

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶10

For the appellant	:	Shri Sneha R. Iyer, Advocate Shri Nishanth Patil, Advocate
For the respondent	:	Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate

¶11

CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER

¶12

ORDER 06.10.2017

¶13

FPA-PMLA-1926/BNG/2017

¶14

A fresh appeal has been filed u/s 26 of the PMLA-2002 against the order dated 7^th July, 2017.

¶15

Issue notice. Mr. N.K. Matta, counsel for the respondent accepts the notice and seeks six weeks time to file the reply. Let the same be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant, who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.

¶16

List on 22^nd March, 2018.

¶17

MP-PMLA-3805/BNG/2017 (Stay)

¶18

Alongwith the appeal an application for stay has been filed. Issue notice to the respondent. Mr. N.K. Matta, counsel of the respondent accepts the notice and seeks six weeks time to file the reply. Let the same

¶19

FPA-PMLA-1926/BNG/2017

¶20

Page 1 of 2

¶21

be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant, who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.

¶22

List on 22^nd March, 2018.

¶23

The learned counsel for the appellant is pressing for interim order however, he submits that no notice u/s 8(4) has been received. Mr. N.K. Matta, counsel for the respondent agrees in case notice u/s 8(4) of PMLA has been issued, a copy of the same will also serve to the appellant, who may press the interim order.

¶24

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶25

(G.C. Mishra) Member

¶26

New Delhi, 06^th October, 2017.

¶27

‘s’

¶28

FPA-PMLA-1926/BNG/2017

¶29

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1926/BNG/2017 of Prashanth Govindraju v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1926/BNG/2017 of Prashanth Govindraju v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases