Single paragraph order setting procedural time limits for filed appeals under Section 26 of the PMLA, 2002, acknowledging respondent's appearance.
Notice issued; reply due within four weeks; rejoinder due within two weeks; case listed for 05.01.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3768/DLI/2017 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-3769/DLI/2017 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1908/DLI/2017
Ravi Aggarwal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER ORDER 22.09.2017
FPA-PMLA-1908/DLI/2017
Appeal has been filed under Section 26 of the PMLA, 2002. Issue notice. Shri Atul Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent accepts the notice. Reply to be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder two weeks thereafter.
List on 05th January, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 22nd September, 2017 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1908/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal filed under Section 26 of the PMLA should be allowed to proceed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravi Aggarwal
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
