Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1898/KOL/2017 of Rose Valley Project v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata

ATFP25 Sept 2017FPA-PMLA-1898/KOL/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single judge appeal and stay application were listed for arguments. The court condoned a 25-day delay as slight, directed the appellant to supply missing paper books, fixed timelines for reply and rejoinder, and listed the matter for future hearing. No substantive decision was recorded.

What did the court decide?

Application for stay and condonation of delay disposed of by condoning 25-day delay; notices issued for filing reply/rejoinder; matter listed for future hearing.

FPA-PMLA-1898/KOL/2017 of Rose Valley Project v/s The Joint… — Intellectual Property | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEYLAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3737/KOL/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3738/KOL/2017 (Exemption) MP-PMLA-3739/KOL/2017 (COD) &

¶3

FPA-PMLA-1898/KOL/2017

¶4

Rose Valley Project … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent

¶5

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶6

For the appellant	: Shri Mudit Gupta, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN

¶7

ORDER

¶8

25.09.2017

¶9

MP-PMLA-3737/KOL/2017 (Stay), MP-PMLA-3739/KOL/2017 (COD) & FPA-PMLA-1898/KOL/2017

¶10

The appeal has been filed under Section 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 against the order dated 5^th June, 2017. Alongwith the application for Stay and Condonation of Delay has been filed. As per the delay part is concerned since it is a small delay. Thus, the delay in filing the appeal of 25 days is condoned and application is accordingly disposed of.

¶11

Issue notice in the appeal as well as in the Stay Application. The learned counsel for the appellant agrees to supply the complete set of paper book which has not been supplied to the counsel for the respondent. The learned counsel for the respondent states that the Part-2 of the files has not been supplied. The learned counsel for the appellant agrees to supply the same within one week. Issue notice to the respondent to file the reply. Let

¶12

FPA-PMLA-1898/KOL/2017 Page 1 of 2

¶13

the same be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for

¶14

the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.

¶15

List on 1^st February, 2018.

¶16

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶17

New Delhi, 25^th September, 2017

¶18

‘K’

¶19

FPA-PMLA-1898/KOL/2017 Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1898/KOL/2017 of Rose Valley Project v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1898/KOL/2017 of Rose Valley Project v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases